The Frankfurt School, Part 5

Peter Thompson

The Guardian

2017-04-07

“For Benjamin, religion was a vessel that contained within its authoritarian history and structures the spark of liberation”

“Quoting Hegel, Walter Benjamin reminds us that before all philosophy comes the struggle for material existence: “Secure at first food and clothing, and the kingdom of God will come to you of itself – Hegel, 1807”, or as Brecht – Benjamin’s greatest and closest friend – put it “first bread, then morality”.”

“What sets all of the thinkers in this series apart from many of their more orthodox Marxist contemporaries is precisely their concern with those issues which cannot be measured, tested and decided upon but which remain undecided and undecidable.”

“As Benjamin puts it in his On the Concept of History: “The class struggle, which always remains in view for a historian schooled in Marx, is a struggle for the rough and material things, without which there is nothing fine and spiritual. Nevertheless these latter are present in the class struggle as something other than mere booty, which falls to the victor. They are present as confidence, as courage, as humour, as cunning, as steadfastness in this struggle, and they reach far back into the mists of time. They will, ever and anon, call every victory which has ever been won by the rulers into question. Just as flowers turn their heads towards the sun, so too does that which has been turned, by virtue of a secret kind of heliotropism, towards the sun which is dawning in the sky of history. To this most inconspicuous of all transformations the historical materialist must pay heed.””

“On this reading, history escapes a linear or teleological path around a fixed point and becomes a mixture of points at which possibilities are either realised or rejected but never disappear completely.”

“Again, this continues the theme that Marx took up in his 1844 letter to Ruge, which I have quoted before, about the realisation of a long-held human dream.”

“Benjamin calls this “messianic time” in which historical possibility is resurrected over and over again in order to inform our choices at specific historical junctures.”

“Until this unrealisable future becomes realisable its traces have to be read into the symbolic forms of human expression in various different historical epochs.”

“To return to Adorno’s take on history in Negative Dialectics, Benjamin’s position is that we find the solution to the apparent non-identity of the material and the transcendental within the symbolic.”

“We can see here quite clearly another point of contact between Marx and Freud where transcendental thoughts exist not as something separate from material reality but as something both produced by and also affecting and influencing that material reality.”

“In Marx this is the interpenetrating relationship between base and superstructure, to put it at its simplest, and in Freud it exists in the relationship between the conscious and the unconscious realms.”

“In Freud the symbolic plays the role of expression of that which is unknown to us but which we secretly know; namely, the unconscious. In Marx this symbolic expression is present in ideology, which, far from being a straightforward linear relationship between base and superstructure is constantly in flux and which can be captured and changed by the attempted realisations of human possibility.”

“Ideas change as society changes but ideas also create social change.”

“If fascism represented the aestheticisation of politics then the fight against fascism had to involve the politicisation of aesthetics and the active creation of the aura of potential.”

“This is why Benjamin states that “the tradition of the oppressed teaches us that the ‘state of emergency’ in which we live is not the exception but the rule. We must attain to a conception of history that is in keeping with this insight. Then we shall clearly realise that it is our task to bring about a real state of emergency, and this will improve our position in the struggle against fascism.””

“In other words, all class society is a permanent state of emergency in which the rulers are always under threat.”


Previous Entry Next Entry

« The Frankfurt School, Part 4 The Frankfurt School, Part 6 »